Press "Enter" to skip to content

Tag: memetic warfare

Athena’s Shield: Five Core Principles for Protecting Thought Sovereignty

AI discourse-mongers, automated dark algos, shadowy consent architects (Diffusion XL)

We live in a time of swarm networks, full spectrum memetic warfare, and ubiquitous AI discourse-mongers. Automated dark algos package, aggregate, and curate all social content for maximum cognitive impact. The influence of shadowy consent architects is already pervasive, only to become stronger as more powerful AI discourse-mongers come alive. 

You encounter their work with every click, swipe, and scroll as they reshape your perception. In this environment, protecting the sovereignty of your thoughts is strategically important. Your mental processes are vulnerable to various exploits, ranging from subtle perception modulation to infiltration of schemas and the outright usurpation of your cognition frames by synthetic frameworks. 

Here are five basic rules of thumb for protecting your mental sovereignty. Combined, they form the acronym AEGIS – the name of Athena’s shield. 

– Analyze Assumptions:  Continuously audit your beliefs and opinions to identify assumptions with unclear provenance. This practice ensures that your mental models remain free from malicious narrative injections. 

E – Evaluate Inputs: Filter all content inputs for positioning, source coherence, time relevance, and downstream reliability. Ask, “Why am I seeing this here and now? Was this source useful before?” In a time of dark algo content curation, an open mind is like an open wound. 

G – Guard Core Beliefs: Protect the central tenets of your worldview and hide your root discourse schema. Airgapping your core operant frames helps you prevent automated perception modulation and targeted frame injections. 

– Isolate Viewpoints: Practice multi-viewpoint partitioning and mentally compartmentalize multiple perspectives on common media events. This prevents the cross-contamination of frames and allows you to analyze them and build your own organic cognitive frameworks. 

S – Scan Memdata: Scrutinize information stored in memory with the presumption that it could be an attempt to manipulate your perception frames or inject a schema exploit. These exploits commonly use the “if this, then that” logic, tying injected data to an innocuous memory. Ask, “Why am I remembering this when I see that? When I see x, why am I associating it with y?” This practice helps clear your memory from past exploits and protects you from common memetic attacks. 

The AEGIS strategy – Analyze Assumptions, Evaluate Inputs, Guard Core Beliefs, Isolate Viewpoints, and Scan Memdata – is a proactive defense mechanism safeguarding your mental sovereignty. By adopting these practices, you arm yourself with Athena’s shield against the relentless onslaught of cognitive manipulation. This battle is not just about resisting synthetic thoughts or weaponized perception; it is about asserting your mental sovereignty in a world where your thoughts are the main prize. 

The best memes are never funny

This is Episode 4 of Naive and Dangerous, the podcast series about emergent media I am recording together with my colleague Dr Chris Moore. In this episode we discuss memes and the phenomenon of meme warfare. We start with a historical overview, beginning with ancient Sumer and the gods Enki and Asherah symbolizing the ur-memes of chaos and order, and then move onto the Egyptian god Kek and the emergent phenomenon of Kekism. We then move on to a definition of memes as frames influencing our perception of reality, and the emergent phenomenon of swarm-driven meme warfare as a dynamic contest over perception. Have a listen.

Cognitive mercantilism

In his Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism Robert Jay Lifton gives the following interesting definition of the language of a totalist environment [p.429]:

The language of the totalist environment is characterized by the thought-terminating cliché. […] [B]rief, highly reductive, definitive-sounding phrases, easily memorized and easily expressed […] become the start and finish of any ideological analysis.

In other words, the preponderance of thought-terminating cliché phrases such as ‘agree to disagree’, ‘it’s all relative’, ‘this is hate-speech’, ‘these are the facts’, ‘[authority figures] all agree’, ‘this is [x] privilege’, ‘that’s your opinion’ is a symptom of being in a totalist environment.

A totalist environment is characterized by fully synthetic thinking, itself a function of a dynamic milieu control of information. In an environment of dynamic milieu control, certain information inputs – phrases, words, images, feelings – are branded as undesirable and banned from circulation. This in turn means that any and all thoughts associated with these information inputs become undesirable and dangerous.

In effect, synthetic thinking, as modulated by milieu control, acts to remove undesirable wrong-think and wrong-speech from all downstream communication feedback loops. Importantly, this is a self-reinforcing mechanism which, over time, generates an equally synthetic, and total, image of reality.

When consistently performed at scale over a given time-space, the causal chain of milieu control >> synthetic thinking >> synthetic reality leads to the emergence of cognitive mercantilism. Cognitive mercantilism is the systemic and dynamic formatting of the cognitive processing of a given local reality [i.e. a country], as directed by the actors in control of the communication mechanism of that local reality [i.e. the state].

This is how this maps to the historical process so far:

local mercantilism [tribal/feudal state] >> colonial mercantilism [empire/colonial state] >> [pseudo] liberal colonialism [we are here] >> cognitive mercantilism